Wide World of Women :: View topic - Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model?

Is this the Holy Grail?

At least one of the pictures looks completely legit.
What do ya'll think?
Is this the Holy Grail?

Fazda wrote:

:thankyou
With all the members on here, I would think someone could find pics of her Victoria Secret days. I've searched multiple times, but always come up empty.

It's likely because they don't exist...

It's been discussed on WWoW before, but in a nutshell, Kimberly appears to have slightly fluffed-up
her resume from her pre-Fox and pre-Newsom days.

She WAS a model, and she DID work for VS and Macy's --- but not in print media or on video.
These were mostly runway shows held at fashion events and shopping malls in the early-mid '1990s -- sort of on a third-string level.
The only way anything would show her would be if anyone happened to be taking pictures at the time,
and even at that, they wouldn't have been honed in on Kimberly, since she was unknown then.

She may have had her own portfolio shots from those days, but she doesn't seem to have released anything if she does.

Left to right -
1. It is from a Victoria's Secret fashion show, but it's one from April 2007, way too recent to have been
Kimberly, and obviously not her face. A random unidentified model.
Here's the event it's from:
http://www.newyorksocialdiary.com/party ... t-dressing
Kimberly had already joined Fox by this time, and been divorced from Gavin Newsome....her modeling days were
already years behind her. (see details below)

2. Mila Kunis -- clearly. Not even sure how this got mistaken for KG.
It's from Mila's photoshoot for Complex Magazine in 2008.
http://www.gotceleb.com/mila-kunis-comp ... 02-17.html

3. It's model Imogen Thomas, from one of her earliest photoshoots. How do we know?
Maybe because it says "IMOGEN THOMAS" right there to the left of her. :Doh

Amazing that this shot, even with Imogen's name on it gets attributed to Kim so often.
Not very much facial resemblance either.

This is the one I thought looked legit though.

MelvinMoogleman wrote:

This is the one I thought looked legit though.

That's definitely Kimberly -- I've seen it before and think
it's from a shoot she did when she was still San Francisco's first lady at the official residence.

Not really lingerie, though. More like an elegant party dress.

.

Author:	MelvinMoogleman [ Thu Sep 01, 2016 3:16 pm ]
Post subject:	Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model?
I put this here since I did a search and found the same topic was discussed here previously. I found this web site doing a search for something unrelated, saw KG's name and followed the breadcrumbs http://victoriassecret.filminspector.com/2014/11/kimberly-guilfoyle-legal-model.html At least one of the pictures looks completely legit. What do ya'll think? Is this the Holy Grail?

Author:	braniac [ Thu Sep 01, 2016 3:31 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model
MelvinMoogleman wrote: Is this the Holy Grail? The San Francisco Chronicle says she was an underwear model and I'd consider them a reliable source. I'm not so sure that the photos are really of her but they were a long time ago. http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/ ... 924603.php

Author:	fordloco [ Thu Sep 01, 2016 5:24 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model
One heck of a tribute to Kin and some other fine looking women. Validity be darned, quite enjoyable post.

Author:	rangerman04 [ Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:45 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model

Author:	udirtysanchez69 [ Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:35 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model

Wide World of Women http://www.wideworldofwomen.net/Forum/

Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model? http://www.wideworldofwomen.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=233160	Page 1 of 1

Author:	rumpletweezer [ Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:42 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model
Don't know if it IS the Holy Grail (sure looks like it might be) but your entire post brings back some classic Kimberly pics, with emphasis on that basketball game!!! Dress riding up sooooo high on those thighs!!!

Author:	pacificRT [ Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:06 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model
MelvinMoogleman wrote: At least one of the pictures looks completely legit. What do ya'll think? Is this the Holy Grail? Nope -- still not. You're right, we have covered this numerous times over the last few years, every time someone sees a photo online that somebody's slapped a "kimberly victoria's secret" label on, but it never turns out to be legit. Scanning through the pics on this guy's blog, what's strange is that he notes how mistakes have been made before, yet up top he puts photos that are clearly not Kimberly. Here's the story on the three bad ones he mixed in with the good ones--- I'll line them up here then explain them: Left to right - 1. It is from a Victoria's Secret fashion show, but it's one from April 2007, way too recent to have been Kimberly, and obviously not her face. A random unidentified model. Here's the event it's from: http://www.newyorksocialdiary.com/party ... t-dressing Kimberly had already joined Fox by this time, and been divorced from Gavin Newsome....her modeling days were already years behind her. (see details below) 2. Mila Kunis -- clearly. Not even sure how this got mistaken for KG. It's from Mila's photoshoot for Complex Magazine in 2008. http://www.gotceleb.com/mila-kunis-comp ... 02-17.html 3. It's model Imogen Thomas, from one of her earliest photoshoots. How do we know? Maybe because it says "IMOGEN THOMAS" right there to the left of her. Amazing that this shot, even with Imogen's name on it gets attributed to Kim so often. Not very much facial resemblance either. I won't bother typing out the whole thing, so I'll just quote myself from a 2014 thread when this subject came up -- pacificRT wrote: Fazda wrote: :thankyou With all the members on here, I would think someone could find pics of her Victoria Secret days. I've searched multiple times, but always come up empty. It's likely because they don't exist... It's been discussed on WWoW before, but in a nutshell, Kimberly appears to have slightly fluffed-up her resume from her pre-Fox and pre-Newsom days. She WAS a model, and she DID work for VS and Macy's --- but not in print media or on video. These were mostly runway shows held at fashion events and shopping malls in the early-mid '1990s -- sort of on a third-string level. The only way anything would show her would be if anyone happened to be taking pictures at the time, and even at that, they wouldn't have been honed in on Kimberly, since she was unknown then. She may have had her own portfolio shots from those days, but she doesn't seem to have released anything if she does. I'm afraid finding anything of substance that proves Kimberly even did that work back then is going to be like coming up with the Loch Ness Monster at this point. I know one thing -- I never want to be in a police lineup where any of these guys tagging pics so poorly are the witnesses that have to ID the right criminal! .

Author:	MelvinMoogleman [ Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:30 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model
pacificRT wrote: Left to right - 1. It is from a Victoria's Secret fashion show, but it's one from April 2007, way too recent to have been Kimberly, and obviously not her face. A random unidentified model. Here's the event it's from: http://www.newyorksocialdiary.com/party ... t-dressing Kimberly had already joined Fox by this time, and been divorced from Gavin Newsome....her modeling days were already years behind her. (see details below) 2. Mila Kunis -- clearly. Not even sure how this got mistaken for KG. It's from Mila's photoshoot for Complex Magazine in 2008. http://www.gotceleb.com/mila-kunis-comp ... 02-17.html 3. It's model Imogen Thomas, from one of her earliest photoshoots. How do we know? Maybe because it says "IMOGEN THOMAS" right there to the left of her. Amazing that this shot, even with Imogen's name on it gets attributed to Kim so often. Not very much facial resemblance either. I agree with all the above This is the one I thought looked legit though.

Author:	pacificRT [ Fri Sep 02, 2016 6:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model
MelvinMoogleman wrote: This is the one I thought looked legit though. That's definitely Kimberly -- I've seen it before and think it's from a shoot she did when she was still San Francisco's first lady at the official residence. Not really lingerie, though. More like an elegant party dress. .

Author:	MelvinMoogleman [ Sun Sep 04, 2016 3:59 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model
pacificRT wrote: MelvinMoogleman wrote: This is the one I thought looked legit though. That's definitely Kimberly -- I've seen it before and think it's from a shoot she did when she was still San Francisco's first lady at the official residence. Not really lingerie, though. More like an elegant party dress. . DON'T DENY ME MY FANTASY. MAN! If she showed up on The Five dressed like that, for Basketball II, with Dana playing defense, would that be the best show ever? I ask you.

Author:	Velcro [ Sun Sep 04, 2016 3:56 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kimberly Guilfoyle lingerie model?
According to that url.. Code: http://www.newyorksocialdiary.com/party-pictures/2007/dressed-to-kilt-dressing ..Kimberly was at that event and participated, but it was the wrong pic. Here's the pic from that page Code: http://www.newyorksocialdiary.com/legacy/i/partypictures/04_12_07/kilt/IMG_1170.jpg and then there's this from Getty: Code: http://www.gettyimages.com/event/dressed-to-kilt-2007-73744182#kimberly-guilfoyle-and-eric-villency-walk-the-runway-at-johnnie-to-picture-id73779072

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/