| Wide World of Women http://www.wideworldofwomen.net/Forum/ |
|
| Jamie Colby http://www.wideworldofwomen.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=68353 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Mullin [ Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Jamie Colby |
she was in for Jane today... credit to capper |
|
| Author: | trainjunkie47 [ Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Did we see any leg? |
|
| Author: | Mullin [ Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
No clue I wasn't home.... got the cap from a friend |
|
| Author: | Laker [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
trainjunkie47 wrote: Did we see any leg?
No leg Thanks for posting Mullin |
|
| Author: | flaming_cowpie [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
There's very few times that Jamie's on the air that she doesn't show off good leggage, so let us just close our eyes and imagine.... Ahh.... |
|
| Author: | Greenfly [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
laker44 wrote: trainjunkie47 wrote: Did we see any leg? No leg Thanks for posting Mullin
|
|
| Author: | snwide [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
flaming_cowpie wrote: There's very few times that Jamie's on the air that she doesn't show off good leggage, so let us just close our eyes and imagine.... Slow down Ahh.... imagination running away... may end up like this
|
|
| Author: | Mullin [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Greenfly wrote: laker44 wrote: trainjunkie47 wrote: Did we see any leg? No leg Thanks for posting Mullin ![]() Jamie doesn't have to show leg to get attention... just look at her face and smile |
|
| Author: | trainjunkie47 [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Mullin is so right. While I hope to see leg any time Jamie is on, her face is so inviting.
|
|
| Author: | Greenfly [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
It's in the Constitution in small print not many know this. It is #11 of the Bill of Rights. From hence all wenches in the news/entertainment media shall be required to show thy legs for all to see.
Hey this is from the wisdom of the Founding Fathers who are we to judge them. I think this was created by John Adams. He was a little frustrated Abigail wasn't giving him any.
|
|
| Author: | Mullin [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Greenfly wrote: It's in the Constitution in small print not many know this. It is #11 of the Bill of Rights. From hence all wenches in the news/entertainment media shall be required to show thy legs for all to see.
Hey this is from the wisdom of the Founding Fathers who are we to judge them. I think this was created by John Adams. He was a little frustrated Abigail wasn't giving him any. ![]() Jamie is not a HOT BABE!
|
|
| Author: | Greenfly [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 10:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hey don't blame me blame John Adams.
Don't tell me you don't have dreams of Jamie in a Hooters uniform. We all do.
HOT BABE! more ale for my throat is parched and more of how you say this chicken wings!
|
|
| Author: | Mullin [ Sat Sep 29, 2007 10:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Greenfly wrote: Hey don't blame me blame John Adams.
Don't tell me you don't have dreams of Jamie in a Hooters uniform. We all do. HOT BABE! more ale for my throat is parched and more of how you say this chicken wings! ![]() Can't say I do |
|
| Author: | trainjunkie47 [ Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Don't tell me you don't have dreams of Jamie in a Hooters uniform. We all do.
Count me out also. I'm not saying any Hooters girl is trashy or a HOT BABE!, but Jamie Colby would be taking a huge step backwards wearing that uniform. I could see a military officers uniform, right next to Catherine Bell. Not as revealing, but significantly more dignified. |
|
| Author: | flaming_cowpie [ Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
snwide wrote: flaming_cowpie wrote: There's very few times that Jamie's on the air that she doesn't show off good leggage, so let us just close our eyes and imagine.... Slow down Ahh.... imagination running away... may end up like this ![]() But the fantasy of the leggage is just as good |
|
| Author: | Greenfly [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
trainjunkie47 wrote: Quote: Don't tell me you don't have dreams of Jamie in a Hooters uniform. We all do. Count me out also. I'm not saying any Hooters girl is trashy or a HOT BABE!, but Jamie Colby would be taking a huge step backwards wearing that uniform. I could see a military officers uniform, right next to Catherine Bell. Not as revealing, but significantly more dignified. Then what "dignified" thing does she do next then?
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|