34 Sexiest People in Television News of 2015 (Mediaite)

johnkay · **Joined:** Sun Nov 25, 2012 12:23 am **Posts:** 6403

Anna Kooiman, Elisabeth Hasselbeck, Gillian Turner, Tamron Hall, Harris Faulkner, Jedediah Bila, Megyn Kelly, Abby Huntsman, Kimberly Guilfoyle, Alex Wagner,Kayna Whitworth, Hallie Jackson, Brooke Baldwin, Sabrina Siddiqui, Ashleigh Banfield, Poppy Harlow, Rula Jebreal, Kate Bolduan, Chris Jansing, Norah O'Donnell, Jackie Guerrido and some men lol! Great list!!
http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-34-s ... news-2015/

sparty · **Posted:** Thu Dec 31, 2015 1:15 pm

Ainsley isn't on the list so it has no credibility whatsoever

johnkay · **Joined:** Sun Nov 25, 2012 12:23 am **Posts:** 6403

sparty wrote:

Ainsley isn't on the list so it has no credibility whatsoever

knew you would say that but I disagree. they weren't going to do a list of 34 people from fox but it is a pretty good list.
Sandra and Nicole are 2 more Fox hosts missing and Amy Robach and Dylan should also be on there in my opinion but overall, very good choices.

sparty · **Posted:** Thu Dec 31, 2015 1:21 pm

No Robin Meade either

Mullin · **Joined:** Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:00 pm **Posts:** 32133

sparty wrote:

Ainsley isn't on the list so it has no credibility whatsoever

Are you really serious? Not everyone agrees with your appraisal of Ainsley or any other woman for that matter...

It's someone's opinion... don't like it don't read it

braniac · **Posted:** Thu Dec 31, 2015 2:05 pm

Other than the possibility of some good photos, lists and polls based on beauty or sex appeal seem pretty useless to me. It's not voting for Nobel Prize winners because of their profound accomplishments. Different strokes for different folks mean there are always people who disagree with who's on these lists, the order, the reasons, etc.

Mullin · **Joined:** Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:00 pm **Posts:** 32133

braniac wrote:

Other than the possibility of some good photos, lists and polls based on beauty or sex appeal seem pretty useless to me. It's not voting for Nobel Prize winners because of their profound accomplishments. Different strokes for different folks mean there are always people who disagree with who's on these lists, the order, the reasons, etc.

Correct

bigzman · **Joined:** Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:13 am **Posts:** 6423

What about Liz Claman, Hannah Storm, or Linda Cohn?

hanley · **Joined:** Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:51 pm **Posts:** 844

sparty wrote:

Ainsley isn't on the list so it has no credibility whatsoever

or maybe all the women they picked are just hotter than she is.

sparty · **Posted:** Thu Dec 31, 2015 2:37 pm

hanley wrote:

sparty wrote:

Ainsley isn't on the list so it has no credibility whatsoever

or maybe all the women they picked are just hotter than she is.

Alex Wagner's presence on the list makes that a false statement right away

Mullin wrote:

sparty wrote:

Ainsley isn't on the list so it has no credibility whatsoever

Are you really serious? Not everyone agrees with your appraisal of Ainsley or any other woman for that matter...

It's someone's opinion... don't like it don't read it

I KNOW not everybody agrees with yours
But of course, your opinions always change
Just ask Jamie Colby

Laker · **Posted:** Thu Dec 31, 2015 3:15 pm

sparty wrote:

Ainsley isn't on the list so it has no credibility whatsoever

Alfred E. Neuman is on the list. So it has no credibility.

sparty · **Posted:** Thu Dec 31, 2015 3:19 pm

Laker wrote:

sparty wrote:

Ainsley isn't on the list so it has no credibility whatsoever

Alfred E. Neuman is on the list. So it has no credibility.

fordloco · **Posted:** Thu Dec 31, 2015 9:23 pm

braniac wrote:

Other than the possibility of some good photos, lists and polls based on beauty or sex appeal seem pretty useless to me. It's not voting for Nobel Prize winners because of their profound accomplishments. Different strokes for different folks mean there are always people who disagree with who's on these lists, the order, the reasons, etc.

That being said, some previous winners of the Nobel Peace Prize sure didn't deserve that either. :cowboy

braniac · **Posted:** Thu Dec 31, 2015 11:47 pm

fordloco wrote:

braniac wrote:

Other than the possibility of some good photos, lists and polls based on beauty or sex appeal seem pretty useless to me. It's not voting for Nobel Prize winners because of their profound accomplishments. Different strokes for different folks mean there are always people who disagree with who's on these lists, the order, the reasons, etc.

That being said, some previous winners of the Nobel Peace Prize sure didn't deserve that either. :cowboy

Politics alert! :Whip

We all know who you're referring to. :blah

Brettfan · **Joined:** Sun Aug 22, 2004 7:37 pm **Posts:** 3914

Sticking to national is a good idea since they would go in the weeds with locals. I could do one with many women on locals and did post a few on that post at Mediaite. But I want to add this they won't be adding any of the newer national networks because they aren't important enough so no Fusion, One America News Network, CBSN, Russia Today or Al Jazeera. They also didn't do Foreign Networks so no CBC, BBC or Sky News. All You CNN, Fox News and MSNBC people forget their are other networks. Plus no ABC, NBC, PBS or CBS, which runs CBSN.

Wide World of Women

34 Sexiest People in Television News of 2015 (Mediaite)

Who is online