View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 2 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
vaco
|
Post subject: camera vs camcorder in indoors places with low light Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:14 pm |
|
 |
| WWoW Artist |
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:42 pm Posts: 207 Location: Lima, Peru
|
|
I had a 720 HD camera that got better quality videos in indoors places with low light, than a 1080 Full HD camcorder.
The latter gave rainy scenes, while the camera image was smoother and with better contrast, with more clean looking videos.
Is it always better a camera in this situations?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
SlashAsterisk
|
Post subject: Re: camera vs camcorder in indoors places with low light Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:07 pm |
|
 |
| WWoW Artist |
 |
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:44 pm Posts: 1304
|
|
Higher resolution video requires better lighting conditions as the resolution increases. Low-light noise is a royal pita to HD video cams.
Still-Camera's will generally produce better imaging in low-light because the receptor is typically larger and the shutter & apertures can be adjusted for how much & how long light is exposed to the imager. Also add in the fact that most still cameras use flash.
Video in any form will always need better light than still camera's. Most high end HD vidcams have a built in light, but most producers will also set up additional lighting in order to get better results.
_________________ Out of touch and out of time.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 2 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|